Site logo

The Cult of Saints in Late Antiquity


from its origins to circa AD 700, across the entire Christian world


Calendar of the Church of Carthage (central North Africa) lists saints whose liturgical commemorations were celebrated in November. Written in Latin in Carthage, probably between 505 and 535.

Evidence ID

E02202

Type of Evidence

Liturgical texts - Calendars and martyrologies

Calendar of Carthage
November

Kal. Nov. sancti Octavi.
... Id Nov. sanctorum Capitanorum.
Idus sancti Valentini.
... Kal. Dec. sancti Clementis.
... Kal. Dec. sancti Chrysogoni martyris.
... Kal. Dec. sancti Andreae Apostoli et martyris.


'1 November.   (Feast) of saint Octavius.
... November.   (Feast) of the
Capitanani saints.
13 November.   (Feast) of saint Valentinus.
[23] November. (Feast) of saint Clemens.
[24] November. (Feast) of saint Chrysogonus, martyr.
[29] November. (Feast) of saint Andrew, apostle and martyr.'


[*Octavius, otherwise unknown martyr, S03070;  *
Capitani, otherwise unknown martyrs, S02908;  *Valentinus, otherwise unknown martyr, S03071;  Clemens, bishop of Rome and martyr of the Crimea, S00111;  *Chrysogonus, martyr of Aquileia venerated in Rome, S00911; *Andrew, the apostle, S00288]


Text: Mabillon 1682, 398.
Translation and identifications: Bryan Ward-Perkins.

Festivals

Saint’s feast

Source

The calendar of Carthage was discovered by Jean Mabillon in the library of Cluny abbey, on sheets of parchment attached to the wooden boards binding a codex of Jerome's commentary on Isaiah, and a full transcription and commentary was published by him in 1682 in volume 3 of his Analecta Vetera. Mabillon recorded that the text was affected by wormholes and other damage (as is also clear from the gaps in his transcription). For photographs of Mabillon's text, see the Images attached to E02196.

A brief description of the manuscript, written in 1722, stated that it consisted to two sheets of parchment and a third half sheet, all used in the later binding (Oursel 1906). These were last recorded in the library at the very beginning of the nineteenth century, and were subsequently lost. Mabillon's transcription is the only record of the text.

Mabillon wrote that '[t]he script is Roman, written in majuscule letters, no later than the seventh century' (
Scriptura Romana est, litteris majusculis exarata, saeculo septimo non inferior); in the absence of the original, this dating of the manuscript is impossible to verify.

The approximate date of the written text in the form that we have it can be established with some confidence, as the days of the burials of all bishops of Carthage subsequent to Cyprian are recorded, and the last bishop named is Eugenius, who died in exile in around 505 (Victor of Tunnuna,
Chronicle, 86). After Eugenius, the see remained vacant until the election of Bonifatius who held the bishopric from 523 to c. 535. The Calendar, in the form we have it, can therefore be dated to between c. 505 and c. 535. It has, however, sometimes been argued that the core of the text has to pre-date Vandal rule, which started in 439, since there is no reference in the Calendar to martyrs of the Arian persecution under these new masters. The argument, however, is not a strong one, as there is almost no evidence anywhere of cult for the men and women who suffered in the persecutions of the fifth century.

Mabillon rightly termed this document a 'Calendar' (
Kallendarium), a record of the feasts celebrated by a specific church, in this case that of Carthage, as opposed to a 'Martyrology', which is a much more wide-ranging list of feast days. In its preface/title and in the wording of its entries, the Calendar of Carthage draws a distinction between the burials (depositiones) of Carthage's bishops, which were probably marked with comparatively little ceremony, and the natalicia (literally 'birthdays', into heaven) of the martyrs, which were proper feast days. In its combination of episcopal commemorations and major feasts, the Calendar of Carthage is similar to the early calendars of the church of Rome contained in the Chronography of 354, except that the calendars of Rome list the depositiones of its martyrs (E01052) and those of its bishops (E01051) separately.

The Calendar of Carthage also reflects the progressive spread of the cult of saints. In it there are seventy-two feast days for martyrs, compared to the twenty-three noted in Rome in the mid-fourth century, and there are also many more non-local martyrs than in the Roman calendar. In the Calendar of Carthage, martyrs from Rome are particularly well represented, reflecting the close ties between the 'Catholic' church in Africa and the church of Rome: nine unquestionably Roman martyrs are commemorated (with two more whose location is uncertain, but who could well have been Roman).

The Calendar opens the year on 19 April, after Easter, and closes it on 16 February, before Lent (during which, and during the Easter festivities, martyrs' feasts were not celebrated in Carthage). Hence, for instance, the feast of Perpetua and her companions, on 7 March, is absent from the Calendar.

Many of the martyrs recorded in the Calendar of Carthage are otherwise unknown, and because the Calendar records them simply as 'martyrs', without ever specifying their role or rank in life, for these we know no more than their names and their dates of commemoration. In very many cases, we also do not know precisely where they came from and where they were martyred, though, on the basis of those we can locate, we can be confident that all were from central North Africa, not too far distant from Carthage.

There is reason to believe that the precise dates of some commemorations were moved, so that they could to sit on the same days as others (Achelis 1900, 28). It is, for instance, implausible that bishops Deogratias and Eugenius of Carthage, and bishop Restitutus of Carthage and Augustine of Hippo were buried, as the Calendar states, on precisely the same two days, in January and August respectively (see E02199 and (E02204). It is therefore possible that martyrs who appear in the text as companions - for instance, as Flavianus and Septimia do on 25 May (E02196) - were actually separate.


Discussion

Octavius (S03070), commemorated on 1 November, is otherwise unknown. There is a martyr of Turin named Octavius, but he is one of three companion martyrs (S01116) and there is no evidence that any of them attracted more than local cult.

The
Capitani (S02908) are otherwise unknown, nor is the precise name or location of the place they came from known; but, from the geographical pattern of the commemorations in the Calendar of Carthage, we can be confident that it was not far from Carthage.

Valentinus (S03071), commemorated on 13 November, is also otherwise unknown. The only saint Valentinus of our period of any prominence was Valentinus of Rome (S00433), but there is no evidence of him attracting cult beyond Rome in our period,and his feast was (and still is) the 14 February. Our Valentinus in the Calendar of Carthage might perhaps be the same martyr as a Valentinus recorded in the
Martyrologium Hieronymianum (E03071) as commemorated at Carthage four days later (on 17 November), though this Valentinus appears, not on his own, but as the third-named martyr in a group of three or four.

Clemens, commemorated in Carthage in later November (though the exact day is lost), is certainly the bishop of Rome and martyr of the Crimea (S00111), whose feast on 23 November (or very close to it) is extensively documented.

Similarly, Chrysogonus, whose precise day of commemoration at Carthage is also lost, is certainly the martyr of Aquileia venerated in Rome (S00911), whose feast was (and is) on 24 November.

The feast day of Andrew, the apostle (S00288) was also well established at, or very close to, 29 November.


Bibliography

Edition:
[All editions depend on Mabillon's printed text, as he is the only scholar known to have transcribed the Calendar.]

Achelis, H.,
Die Martyrologien, ihre Geschichte und ihr Wert (Abhandlungen der königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, philosophische-historische Klasse, neue Folge, Band III, nro 3; Berlin, 1900), at 18-29 (with commentary).

de Rossi, J. B., and L. Duchesne (ed.),
Acta Sanctorum 65: Novembris II.1 (Brussels, 1894), pp. lxix-lxxii.

Lietzmann, H.,
Die drei ältesten Martyrologien (Bonn 1903), 5-8.

Mabillon, J.,
Vetera Analecta, Vol. 3 (Paris 1682), 398-401 (with commentary, 402-422).

Preuschen,
Analecta. Kürzere Texte zur Geschichte der alten Kirche und des Kanons (Freiburg im Breisgau and Leipzig, 1899), 123-6.

Ruinart, T.,
Acta primorum martyrum sincera et selecta (Paris 1689), 693-5. [in the table of contents, Ruinart states that his text derives from Mabillon's ('Ex tomo 3 Analectorum').]

Further reading:
Oursel, M., “Note sur le calendrier de l’église de Cartage à la bibliotheque de Cluny,” Bulletin historique et philologique du comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques, Année 1906, nos. 1 and 2, 66.


Record Created By

Bryan Ward-Perkins

Date of Entry

19/08/2023

Related Saint Records
IDNameName in SourceIdentity
S00111Clemens/Clement, bishop of Rome, martyr of the CrimeaClemensCertain
S00288Andrew, the ApostleAndreasCertain
S00911Chrysogonus, martyr of Aquileia, venerated in RomeChrysogonusCertain
S02908Capitani, martyrs commemorated at CarthageCapitaniCertain
S03070Octavius, martyr commemorated at CarthageOctaviusCertain
S03071Valentinus, martyr commemorated at CarthageValentinusCertain


Please quote this record referring to its author, database name, number, and, if possible, stable URL:
Bryan Ward-Perkins, Cult of Saints, E02202 - http://csla.history.ox.ac.uk/record.php?recid=E02202